AI & LLM

AI & LLM Penetration Testing

Security testing for LLM-powered features — prompt injection, data leakage, and model abuse, aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10.

Overview

AI and LLM penetration testing secures LLM-powered features against prompt injection, data leakage, and model abuse — aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10 and proven with working exploits.

What we test

Where attackers get in — and where we look.

Direct & indirect prompt injection

Sensitive-data leakage

Insecure output handling & XSS

Training-data & RAG exposure

Excessive agency & guardrail bypass

Model, plugin & supply-chain abuse

How we test

A proof-driven methodology.

Scope & recon

We agree objectives and rules of engagement, then map what you actually expose.

Map the attack surface

Enumerate entry points, roles, and trust boundaries a real attacker would target.

Manual exploitation

Certified testers exploit flaws by hand — chaining issues scanners never connect.

Prove impact

Every finding ships with a working, reproducible proof-of-exploit and business context.

Report & retest

Risk-ranked report with fixes, then a retest that confirms each issue is closed.

What you get

Proof you can act on.

Reproducible proof-of-exploit

Every finding ships with a working exploit and evidence.

Risk-ranked report

CVSS + business context, prioritized for your team.

Remediation guidance

Actionable fixes mapped to each finding.

Retest to verified fix

We confirm closure — proof it’s fixed, not assumed.

Related programs

Make it continuous.

Pair this test with a program that keeps coverage live between engagements.

FAQ

AI & LLM Penetration Testing — questions buyers ask.

What is prompt injection?

Prompt injection manipulates an LLM’s instructions — directly or through poisoned content it reads (indirect) — to make it leak data or take unintended actions. It is the top LLM risk we test.

Do you follow the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Yes — our testing maps to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, covering injection, data leakage, insecure output handling, and excessive agency.

Can you test RAG systems?

Yes — retrieval-augmented generation introduces training-data and context-exposure risks that we specifically target.

Prove what an attacker could actually do.

A short scoping call, no obligation.